Real estate · Transaction review
Property due diligence: Land Register, titles and risks
A property may have an apparently clean Land Register extract yet still present issues concerning access, authorisation, cadastral overlaps, litigation, tenants or planning restrictions. Due diligence transforms scattered documents into a risk map and concrete conditions for signing.
The Land Register must be read in context
The owner, property description, cadastral number, area, ownership shares and entries in parts B and C are checked: mortgages, prohibitions, litigation, easements, preliminary contracts or other encumbrances. An informational extract is valid at the time of issue and must be updated before signing.
The title and chain of transfers can explain current entries and reveal risks not apparent from an isolated reading. Restitution, expropriation, public-domain status or pre-emption rights are relevant to certain properties.
- the owner’s identity and power to dispose;
- continuity of acquisition documents;
- mortgages, attachments and prohibitions;
- easements, access and utilities;
- notations concerning litigation, preliminary contracts or leases.
The cadastral records must be compared with reality
The cadastral plan, floor plans and areas are compared with the on-site situation. Extensions, partitioning, outbuildings or changes of use absent from the documents can delay financing and transfer.
For land, lawful access to a public road, boundaries, possible overlaps and utilities matter. For condominiums, the share in common areas, storage units, parking spaces and association rules are also checked.
Planning and construction can change the legal value
The planning certificate, PUG/PUZ/PUD documentation and local regulations indicate the applicable regime and approval process, but the certificate is not a building permit. Permits, acceptance reports and registration of buildings must align with what actually exists.
Protected areas, monuments, utility corridors, natural hazards, height restrictions or road widening may affect the project. The analysis must be dated because regulations and planning documentation may change.
The report must translate into contractual protection
Each finding must be classified: acceptable, remediable before signing, covered by a warranty or incompatible with the transaction. Conditions precedent, closing documents, price holdbacks and seller’s representations must be linked to the identified risks.
A good report does not promise zero risk. It shows what was checked, what could not be confirmed, the possible effect and who must act before or after transfer.
How we work together
- 01Documents and objective
We clarify the situation, parties, deadline, available documents and desired outcome for the property review.
- 02Legal review
We cross-check the documents against the applicable registers and rules, identify the risks and establish what further information is needed.
- 03Drafting or report
We prepare the agreement, opinion, procedure or audit report, with practical solutions and clearly traceable responsibilities.
- 04Review and implementation
We incorporate comments, deliver the final version and explain the steps, deadlines and evidence to retain.
Frequently asked questions
Is an unencumbered Land Register extract sufficient?+
No. The extract is essential, but does not by itself confirm the physical situation, authorisation, access, full history, debts or planning suitability for the buyer’s project.
Who checks whether the documented area matches reality?+
An authorised cadastral specialist can carry out the measurements. The lawyer relates the results and documents to contractual and land-registration risks.
Can a mortgaged property be bought?+
Yes, but the payment mechanism, creditor’s consent and discharge must be rigorously coordinated. Closing documents must avoid payment of the price without achieving the intended result.
Need property due diligence before signing?
Send the documents and relevant context for a legal assessment and a solution tailored to your objective.
Aveți nevoie de asistență juridică urgentă sau de consultanță de specialitate?
Notă juridică și limitarea răspunderii
Informațiile și articolele publicate pe acest site web sunt puse la dispoziție de Avocatul „Basuc Cosmin Ștefan” exclusiv în scop informativ și educativ general. Materialele prezentate reprezintă analize teoretice și opinii de specialitate la data redactării lor, fără a constitui consultanță juridică, asistență legală sau o opinie aplicabilă unui caz concret. Lectura sau utilizarea acestui conținut nu creează o relație profesională avocat-client între cititor și Cabinet. Având în vedere dinamica legislativă și specificul fiecărei situații de fapt, interpretările conținute nu pot substitui analiza individuală a unei cauze. Pentru stabilirea cadrului juridic aplicabil problemei dumneavoastră și obținerea unei consultații profesionale dedicate, vă invităm să contactați Cabinetul prin mijloacele oficiale de comunicare afișate.
Linkuri utile și legislație
